Archive ‎– Controlling Crowds Part IV

Additional Payment Information: Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) transfer with BIC and IBAN

Any questions? Please ask.

Shipping Information:

◾ buyer pays shipping

◾ shipping is always ed and insured, no "if's" "and's" or "but's"...

◾ double vinyl's (2x12") or CD's count as two etc.

◾ please pay asap after invoice with the total price was send.

◾ the seller is not required to cover return shipping

Please note:
Responsibilities


Grading/Rating (see also below > last words about grading) [Vinyl]:

Mint Vinyl:
I rate vinyl only mint when I bought it directly from the shop/seller & handled carefully.
this grade I use only for 100% top quality, definitely unplayed records.
most of my mint records are in sealed condition.
please note: not all new records are packed in "sealed" plastic.
a record that was played cannot be mint.
a cover with the tiniest writing on cannot be mint.

Near Mint Vinyl:
near mint is as good as new, rarely played (maybe never and I can't ), tiniest marks.
no creases in cover or sleeve.
the near mint grade should satisfy every critical collector.
as good as it can get for a record that has seen a record player.

VG+ Vinyl:
vg+ is my rating for a lovingly handled record
that has been played more than a dozen times.
with maybe some minor markings.
cover maybe has some edge-, ringwear or creases.

VG Vinyl:
vg is the rating which could be described as 'used'.
playable, visible marks or fingerprints,
surface noise apparent in quiet parts & lead-in & run-out grooves.
cover has been used, has creases, maybe some writing on,
if you want to play the record on a party to friends, fine.
if you want to test your hi-fi equipment, find a better one.
if you want a record as investment, find a mint one.

Good+ / Good Vinyl:
good in goldmine standard words to me means acceptable.
acceptable when you can bear scratches.
cover is torn or badly written on.

Generic Cover / Innersleeves
I dont rate generic black or white doublehole cover or sleeves.
writing on generic covers and sleeves doesn't count.
price-tag-rips on generic covers or sleeves doesn't count.

some remarks on general handling:
after adding a record to my collection (bought new or used),
I replace the standard paper inner sleeves with high-quality antistatic silklike sleeves
and replace the record in a separat generic cover outside the original cover and sleeves.
I do this for almost all my records (except for sealed records).

all my records are stored inside protective plastic sleeves.

Grading/Rating [CD]:

the goldmine standard ratings does not refer to CD's,
so I'll do my best to explain how I give ratings for CD's of my collection:

Plastic Jewelcase or Singelcase
I don't rate jewelcases, or generic sleeves (exept. there are sealed and also mint!).
in case of a jewelcase CD, I rate only booklet, insert, inlay (exept. original papersleeve covers).
CD cases with cracked parts I replace with functional or new ones.

Mint CD's:
I use a mint rating only for new CD's.
any used CD could be mint.
many CD's I have played for myself and rated later near mint would be listet by other sellers as mint.. anyway.

Near Mint CD's:
near mint CD's, digipak's and booklets have no creases, maybe a fingerprint.
it could be possible I've never played this CD before.

VG+ CD's:
CD has minor visible mark(s).
digipak's and booklet have minimal creases.

VG CD's:
cd is used and has visible marks or minor scratches.
booklets have creases or folds.
digipak have worn corners or sides.
digipak might have some broken plastic holding-pins.

Good CD's:
usually I don't sell CD's I'd rate less than vg.
exep. I have a verry rare one, in this case you can read the item details.


Any questions? Please ask.

© RUNOUT.GROOVE 2022
© RUNOUT.GROOVE 2023

last words about grading

Here is a quote from Goldmine's website:

Nothing is more important in determining the value of your records than their condition! Yes, their relative rarity and demand is important, but a collector or dealer will pay much more for a record in Near Mint condition than one in Very Good Minus condition.

However, I’ve found that most people with collections or accumulations have an inflated sense of the condition of their discs. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people who think they know what they are talking about tell me, “My records are all Mint!” Sure, and I’ve got some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.

The truth is that most records, especially from before the 1970s, are not in anything close to Mint or Near Mint condition. That is why a collector will pay a for such a disc if he or she has to have it.

This book lists values for records in Near Mint condition. Records in lesser condition are worth a fraction of the Near Mint prices.

For most collectors, Very Good is the lowest grade for which they will pay more than bargain-bin prices. And some won’t even do that. Lower-grade records are only good as place holders, until a better copy comes along, or as examples of truly rare records that are difficult to find in any condition.

Most of the time, LPs are sold with two grades, one for the record and one for the cover. We list only one grade, however, because with some exceptions, albums without covers are worthless, and covers without the accompanying record are worthless. If an album is graded VG for the cover and VG+ for the record, add the two values together and divide by 2 to get a rough estimate of the value of a “mixed grade” LP.

Most records are graded visually. This is because most record dealers have lots of records — hundreds of thousands in some cases — and they don’t have the time to play their entire stock. That said, some defects are easy to see, such as scratches and warps. Others are subtle, such as groove wear from using a cheap or poorly aligned tone arm. It has been our experience that older LPs (1950s to about 1971) tend to play better than they look, and newer LPs (at least until 1989) tend to play worse than they look.

When grading your records, do so under a strong light. Look at everything carefully, and then assign a grade based on your overall observations.

Some records will be worthy of a higher grade except for defects such as writing, tape or minor seam splits. Always mention these when selling a record! For some collectors, they will be irrelevant, but for others, they will be a deal-breaker. For all, they are important to know.

Also, some LPs were made for promotional purposes only. Again, always mention if a record is a promo copy when advertising it for sale!

One of the obstacles to the further growth of record collecting is poor grading and a lack of consensus as to what constitutes a “Very Good Plus” or “Near Mint” record or cover. Over the years, the Goldmine® Grading Guide has tried to standardize this. It is now the most widely used guide for the buying and selling of vinyl albums; many eBay auctions and stand-alone Web sites swear by it. But we recognize that there are many variables to grading a record. As a seller, you are better off grading conservatively and surprising the buyer with a better record than was expected, than by grading based on wishful thinking g and losing a customer.

That said, here are the standard grades for record albums, from best to worst.

MINT (M)
These are absolutely perfect in every way. Often rumored but rarely seen, Mint should never be used as a grade unless more than one person agrees that the record or sleeve truly is in this condition. There is no set percentage of the Near Mint value these can bring; it is best negotiated between buyer and seller.

NEAR MINT (NM OR M-)
A good description of a NM record is “it looks like it just came from a retail store and it was opened for the first time.” In other words, it’s nearly perfect. Many dealers won’t use a grade higher than this, implying (perhaps correctly) that no record or sleeve is ever truly perfect.

NM records are shiny, with no visible defects. Writing, stickers or other markings cannot appear on the label, nor can any “spindle marks” from someone trying to blindly put the record on the turntable. Major factory defects also must be absent; a record and label obviously pressed off center is not Near Mint. If played, it will do so with no surface noise. (NM records don’t have to be “never played”; a record used on an excellent turntable can remain NM after many plays if the disc is properly cared for.)

NM covers are free of creases, ring wear and seam splits of any kind.

NOTE: These are high standards, and they are not on a sliding scale. A record or sleeve from the 1950s must meet the same standards as one from the 1990s or 2000s to be Near Mint! It’s estimated that no more than 2 to 4 percent of all records remaining from the 1950s and 1960s are truly Near Mint. This is why they fetch such high prices, even for more common items.

Don’t assume your records are Near Mint. They must meet these standards to qualify!